<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Good Bridge News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pioneerinstitute.org/blog/news/some-good-bridge-news/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pioneerinstitute.org/blog/news/some-good-bridge-news</link>
	<description>Public Policy Research</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Card</title>
		<link>http://www.pioneerinstitute.org/blog/news/some-good-bridge-news#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Card</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pioneerinstitute.org/blog/news/some-good-bridge-news#comment-538</guid>
		<description>Did you know that if a "bridge" is not over 20' it is not officially classified as a "Bridge" and does not get inspected. Therefore there are many hundreds of these structures that are between 10'-20' throughout Massachusetts (and the nation) that rarely get inspected because they do not offically meet the definition of a bridge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you know that if a &#8220;bridge&#8221; is not over 20&#8242; it is not officially classified as a &#8220;Bridge&#8221; and does not get inspected. Therefore there are many hundreds of these structures that are between 10&#8242;-20&#8242; throughout Massachusetts (and the nation) that rarely get inspected because they do not offically meet the definition of a bridge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
