National standards talking points
By Jim StergiosJune 2nd, 2010
Across the country, the NGA and the CCSSO will be using these talking points over and over again. They will say that the proposed national standards are:
1) Aligned with college and career expectations;
2) Internationally benchmarked against high performing nations;
3) Reflective of vital cross-disciplinary skills such as critical thinking, problem solving, logical reasoning, communication, and team work;
4) Fewer in scope and deeper in meaning; and
5) Clearly written and user-friendly to educators.
In Massachusetts, be prepared for them to focus on #4. Fewer they are right. Deeper they will claim.
Entry Filed under: Education, News
1 Comment Add your own
1. Tom Hoffman | June 3rd, 2010 at 1:44 pm
Actually, the language now is “informed by other top performing countries” rather than “benchmarked,” because they can’t benchmark the ELA standards with any real validity — they’re totally different than any other country’s.
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed