Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research

CitiStat: Don’t make a sham of itBlue Cross Blue Shield – The Public Trough?

Michelle Rhee takes out the knife

Jim StergiosBy Jim Stergios
March 12th, 2008


From the Washingtonian.com piece on Michelle Rhee, the chancellor of DC schools, there is a quote that stood out from the rest of the piece as the primary dilemma that Rhee and Mayor Fenty are trying to stare down:

“She’s got all the right ideas, a wonderful attitude, and she’s open,” says Mary Levy, an authority on school governance with the Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs. “I worry about her being undercut or overwhelmed.”

It seems that Ms. Levy need not worry.

Fenty and Rhee first sought authority from the D.C. Council to reclassify over half of the 700 non-union positions in the Central District Office, making them “at-will”–i.e., now she could fire them. And that is just what happened. She just cut 98 employees.

Look, cutting down on staff is not great work. But when the need for change is great (and it is great in the DC schools), and when the people around you don’t want change, you have to change the people.

If you think that need for change is only in DC, consider the findings of a recent Massachusetts DOE report that only 51 percent of education funding goes to instruction. Much of the remaining 49 percent goes to central administration and non-instructional programming. Perhaps some of our urban superintendents might take a harder look at what Rhee is doing as she advances innovation and the establishment of a “culture of accountability”.

There are more changes to come in DC, including Rhee noted the possibility of more firings. Rhee is serious. Are we?

Entry Filed under: Education, News

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Janet  |  January 25th, 2010 at 9:29 pm

    Everyone knows what is haappening. They are trying to run the poor children out of DC so the affluent can regain the District. Yes the attack dog is who they send . Another example of black people becoming opressed

  • 2. Jim Stergios  |  January 27th, 2010 at 6:37 pm

    Wow, Janet. Where to begin? That’s frankly nonsense and you know it. Or do you assume that trying to improve academic achievement means that the poor will have to leave the city? That would be not only a sad way of thinking, but also empirically wrong.

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Categories

Recent Comments

Education

Healthcare

Middle Cities

Noise across the Bay State

Noise across the Nation

Stats on Government

RSS Feed