Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research

Where the money is — MedicaidThe Devil is in the Details

Earmarks

Steve PoftakBy Steve Poftak
May 2nd, 2008


The budget season is in full swing on Beacon Hill and I wanted to weigh in on one of the overlooked, but pernicious effects of earmarking. First, take a look yourself at the majestic $738 million in earmarks in the current year’s budget.

Media attention focuses on the most egregious pork barrel spending (check out the merry-go-round and its assorted brethren in 7007-0900).

But more importantly, many of the earmarks give specific instruction about what entities will provide services on the state’s behalf. Read through the list, hundreds of the earmarks go to (typically non-profit) service providers. The earmarking process shortcircuits any type of competitive procurement process, with the transparency and disclosure (and lower price/better service) it entails. Would you rather have agency staff deciding on service providers through a competitive process or legislators?

Entry Filed under: News

Leave a Comment

Required

Required, hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed



Categories

Recent Comments

Get A Job

Get Data

Massachusetts Blogs

Massachusetts Elected Officials

Massachusetts Reporting

National Reporting

National/Out of state Opinion Blogs

Meta